Today I sent an essay to a friend to look over before I turned it in because, well, it's important enough to make sure I did make any stupid glaring errors. I got a half a page of notes mostly about how I'm a huge over-user of the comma (I do love a extra-long convoluted sentence, the more clauses the better!). But I received praise over the use of ensure instead of insure.
I have to admit there are homonyms that baffle me but that is not one of them. I have a BA in English and I would like to think that that makes me a bit smarter (with English words) than the average bear. I wanted to scream when I read his note, for Pete's sake he's a civil engineer (though a closet editor, he chose the wrong parent's career to emulate) and I'm the English major. (Wouldn't it be nice if I had an appropriate title to juxtapose with his?)(Wouldn't it be totally awesome I stopped using parenthetical clauses?)
The point is there are words that sound alike and mean different things.
Peak, peek and pique: use them correctly and you'll get a gold star.
Read and red: usually they're ok.
Principal and principle: there is a rule and I don't remember it past a headmaster and a law.
Affect and effect: it's one they teach to kids in school because it's sticky, but easy sticky.
Baste and based: the difference is easy but I missed it in a spelling bee for not asking for a definition.
There are so many. So very, very many. And I love them. I actually discussed them in an interview once, though my love of homonyms might have been the reason they never ever called me back after that interview (rude) I was told that I might be too creative during that interview (what is too creative?).
Oh homonyms. How I love thee and love that I knew how to spell thee (homonym not thee, that hurt that you didn't think I could spell thee, I'm not that bad.)
Showing posts with label civil engineer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label civil engineer. Show all posts
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
